Monday, April 23, 2012
The 12th Post: Warbreaker
Response to: I Think We're All Bozo's on this Bus
TiMER (2009)
Monday, April 9, 2012
Response to: Bloodchild
Response to: Lilith's Brood, Dawn
Monday, April 2, 2012
(1984) The Brother From Another Planet
Response to: Leviathan
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Fahrenheit 451 (1966)
Monday, February 20, 2012
Being John Malkovich (1999)
Response to: Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone
I remember back when the Harry Potter books had just come out. I never read them; I didn’t do a lot of reading as a child. That would be why I read Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone for this past week. It’s not that I never really got into Harry Potter, after the fourth of so movie I began to go out of my way to watch those. I would say that I do enjoy that fantasy world, and that story.
Having first seen the movies, it would be impossible not to read the book from that lens. That is to say, every character or scene in the two media that are similar or similar enough would be viewed as a memory of the movie. So while reading I felt as though I was moving from clip to clip from the movie.
I didn’t finish the book, it’s bookmarked and I’d like to revisit it sometime. I found it to be sort of a casual read; it felt like a scholastic book. At the same time, though, it did have a compelling nature, but that could just be my potterhead friend’s sublime influence over me.
On another note, as it was within the discussion during the class: The Chronicles of Narnia. I had read the series before the disney movies began coming out. The books were easily better than the movies, especially Voyage of the Dawn Treader. Thank you Disney for that let down, it was one of my favorites from the series. The Horse and His Boy was perhaps my most favorite from the series. What I had liked about it the most that book was it pulled you out and away from the Narnia that you had been reading about, you were in the same world but you became exposed to a completely different story and area of the world, also the Main Four of the children where only minor characters in that. Comparing that Harry Potter where you follow the same group through seven books, back to Chronicles of Narnia where you keep meeting new characters with new stories across seven books. Two interesting approaches, I think, to each his own.
Monday, February 13, 2012
Labyrinth (1986)
Wednesday, February 8, 2012
Response to: The Hobbit
Tuesday, February 7, 2012
Time Bandits (1981)
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Response to: Interview with the Vampire
While it is impossible to be unfamiliar with the vampire within our culture; the place I pulled most of my knowledge of how the vampire should be from Bram Stoker’s Dracula. Not that I had much of a standard from that; I had seen the movie about two years ago and I remember that it was fairly fantastic. Had you asked me to recall much from the movie it wouldn’t be much, but having read Interview with the Vampire I feel that there is the are similarities: from the time period of the stories and the fanciness of the vampires. I will need to re-watch that.
But about Interview with the Vampire, I enjoyed it. At times I felt it to be very slow at some points but equally forced me to read on. When Louis and Claudia went to Europe was a very exciting portion. When they finally reached a village where they saw evidence of other vampires only to be let down time and time again by lowly creatures that were only hollow shells of what Louis and the others were.
I remember knowing time and time again that Lestat had not been killed, as Louis said he assumed Lestat was dead, but didn’t know for certain, this foreshadowed it. It certainly didn’t surprise me when he showed up in Paris.
Well, the characters were developed quite well. All being unique and dependent on each other in some part, whether or not they liked it.
What I did notice, and what was mentioned in class: was the sexual neutrality that flows within the story. While I could regurgitate what was said in class, I put off writing this for to long. What I noticed as far as the vampires sexual life was the master slave relationships they had or described. Lestat being on top, and Louis in the only other spot left; but the vampire would seem to lack most sexual desire, replacing them with blood sucking. That is not to say it’s still a curious notion to some of them, especially if the died at the age of five and never experienced sexual interaction of any sort. Claudia asked Louis once on the matter when they were in Paris, mentally she was well along in her adult life, naturally she would want to know but she can’t find out for herself.
Love triangles, Louis is the damsel in distress, the other two points are divided at times between Lestat, Claudia, and what’s his name the leader of the vampires in Paris. Immortality is complicated I guess.
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The Lost Boys (1987)
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Night of the Living Dead
Response to: Monster Island
Monster Island was an incredible story. If I described myself as not being a fan of the zombi-apocalypse I probably would be lying to myself. I have seen a wide range of what pop-culture has to offer as far as movies and games go, so the general plot line of Monster Island wasn't anything new to me.
What was new to me, and what excited me the most was Gary. That is not to say that one person in un-life controlling the undead is anything new to the multiverse that zombies exist in. Gary's entry into un-life, for this story, brought an opportunity to explain most of the behavior of the zombies in Monster Island. In my experience, most stories don't and can't go into the psyche of zombies because zombies are stupid in almost all cases. You certainly don't normally have a main character be a zombie (at least not for the whole story, they should all be zombies in the end or at least zombie food).
I did read all of it, and I enjoyed all of it. I’m not sure what I have to say about it, but I’d like to try to relate it to what I know. Gary reminds me of Arthas for the Warcraft universe, there, I said it. Mael is Ner’zul, the warlock/lich mentor who calls Arthas. The two eventually merge, Arthas becomes the lich king and Gary becomes not only the smartest zombie but also the leader of all the zombies in New York. When Arthas/Gary dies, Bolvar/Dekalb takes their place. Last but not least, everybody else things that Bolvar/Dekalb died, but they didn’t they are both in un-death.
That is what I was thinking while reading Monster Island, I was thinking about Warcraft. Rightfully so, both have amazing stories with amazing characters. Both have undead, and close enough for compassion plotlines.
The last of the last things I can think to comment about is this: the Egyptian mummies? Maybe I missed it somehow, but I don’t get why they got thrown into the mix. I would guess they are only there because Mael is there, and he was a mummy as well. I almost feel it could have worked well without the mummies, but I guess, who would have held off the undead throngs while the survivors escaped? /shrug